Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 3 papers
Filter3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 232papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Study: legal reasoning models citing legal provisions does not equal relying on legal provisions.

    Uses premise permutation and hidden-layer tracing to audit whether legal chain-of-thought truly relies on the cited legal provisions.

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-14B, Llama-3.1-8B and others7
    AbstractUsing counterfactual substitution of authorities and internal commitment tracing, the authors find that legal CoT rulings depend on authorities only to a limited extent and are vulnerable to prompt injection manipulation.

    This study conducts an empirical audit of the causal truthfulness of legal citations in chain-of-thought reasoning of large language models in the legal domain.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. 研究用因果激活修补定位模型服从提示注入指令的决策层

    用因果激活修补定位模型服从提示注入的决策层

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-14B, Qwen3-32B and others7
    Abstract合规的因果杠杆集中在网络后三分之一的低秩子空间,该层也是混淆下检测最好的位置。

    这篇工作用逐层激活修补定位提示注入合规发生在网络何处,并把该位置用于检测验证。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end