Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 28 papers

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.09469

    Secure-CUA: Constraining the Impact of Untrusted Content in Computer-Use Agents

    提出 Secure-CUA,用动作事务约束计算机使用智能体的不可信影响

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 5, Gemini 3.8 Flash, GPT-5.6-Sol
    AbstractSecure-CUA 用每步事务约束不可信影响,良性 TSR 接近 Vanilla-CUA。

    Secure-CUA 要限制图形界面里不可信内容对 CUA 决策和 GUI 执行的影响,同时保留合法任务所需的不可信信息。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.09240

    WebMirage hijacks visual web agents' browser operations with adversarial images

    提出 WebMirage,用局部对抗图像劫持视觉网页 Agent 的浏览器操作

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-13B, LLaVA-v1.6-34B, MiniCPM-o-8B and others6
    Abstract论文提出了针对网络智能体的端到端视觉红队框架 WebMirage,揭示了从视觉定位到浏览器执行的安全脆弱性。

    WebMirage 是一个面向视觉定位网络智能体的流水线感知端到端红队攻击框架。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. MADBench:多智能体辩论安全性评测基准发布

    提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gpt-4o, GPT-5, GPT-6 Astra
    AbstractMADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。

    MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DIBench:面向移动 GUI 智能体多候选选择决策完整性的安全基准

    用 DIBench 评测移动 GUI 智能体被 UI 注入后的决策完整性

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-VL(32B), Qwen3-VL(32B), GUI-Owl(32B) and others7

    Abstract论文提出移动智能体决策完整性基准 DIBench,发现欺诈 UI 注入诱导目标选择并推高完成率,通用防御收益不稳定。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. MMSkillRisk:多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令可诱导 Agent 执行未授权操作

    提出 MMSkillRisk 基准,评测多模态技能图像中的隐藏指令诱导 Agent 越权操作

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-sol, Kimi-K2.6, Kimi-K3 and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMSkillRisk 基准与 NCVA 攻击,揭示多模态技能中教学图像潜藏指令可引发未授权操作并与良性任务共存。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. MMPIBench:多模态提示注入对六种 Agent 框架的跨框架评测

    用 MMPIBench 评测多模态提示注入对 Agent 框架的影响

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro and others6

    Abstract论文提出 MMPIBench 评测多模态提示注入对智能体的影响,发现模型主导行为、尝试远超完成,音频通道缺乏防护。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2609.04533

    Repeat-After-Me:针对黑盒 VLM 的自适应视觉提示注入攻击

    提出 Repeat-After-Me 自适应视觉提示注入,诱导 VLM 智能体执行指定任务

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Opus-4.7, GPT-5.5, Gemini-3.1-Pro and others6

    Abstract论文提出了针对黑盒 VLM 的前缀诱导自适应视觉提示注入,在多款模型上诱发了工具调用与隐私泄露。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. Counter-GEO-Bench:现有护栏难挡 GEO 虚假信息

    构建 COUNTER-GEO-BENCH,评测生成式搜索中的 GEO 虚假信息防御

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Gemma-4-31B-IT, Qwen-3.5-35B-A3B, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E and others8

    Abstract论文构建了针对 GEO 虚假信息的首个防御基准,揭示通用护栏的失效与反作用,并提出了有效的轻量对比检测基线。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. Mind2Web-Injection:面向网页 Agent 视觉提示注入护栏的证据对齐评测

    提出 Mind2Web-Injection 评测网页 Agent 视觉注入护栏

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.6-luna, Qwen3-VL-32B, Qwen3-VL-8B and others6
    Abstract作者称检测、定位和反事实响应在六个 VLM 上可分开。

    Mind2Web-Injection 用来检查网页截图护栏的判决是否对齐到该用的画面证据。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  10. AttacksarXiv 2608.04565

    Researchers propose Breadcrumbing long-range attack that can hijack the evidence chain of DeepResearch-style search agents

    提出权威链劫持与轨迹引导策略演化,劫持搜索 Agent 的证据链

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-9B, Gemma4-31B, DeepResearch and others7

    Abstract论文揭示了多步搜索智能体在受限中间人操纵下的脆弱性,提出 ACH 策略与 TGSE 演化方法并完成系统验证。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  11. AttacksarXiv 2607.00422

    KidnapRAG:黑盒投毒攻击劫持 Agentic RAG 的推理链

    提出 KidnapRAG,用投毒文档黑盒劫持 Agentic RAG 的推理链

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, QwQ-32B and others5
    Abstract顺序投毒可把多步推理拖向指定应答,作者称关键在持续引导而非单次注入。

    KidnapRAG 是针对 Agentic RAG 的 black-box 语料投毒:攻击者不能访问模型、提示词、检索器或私有轨迹,只能发布可能被检索的文档,并利用公开界面上的推理与搜索查询。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  12. AttacksarXiv 2606.12716

    PaperGuard:针对多模态 AI 同行评审的攻击与防御基准

    提出 PaperGuard,用图文注入与梯度扰动抬高自动审稿分数并检测恶意指令

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Claude-sonnet-4.5, GPT-4o, GPT-4.1 and others11
    AbstractPaperGuard 测到提示注入与白盒视觉抬分,并比较分块检索防御。

    PaperGuard同时评测并检测多模态 AI 审稿中的评分操纵。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  13. AttacksarXiv 2605.28074

    SilentRetrieval: Hijacking retrieval-augmented generation with semantically preserved adversarial data poisoning

    提出 SilentRetrieval,以语义保持对抗文档投毒劫持 RAG 检索与生成

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-2-7B-Chat, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2, Qwen-7B-Chat and others10
    Abstract两阶段投毒在单文档协议下兼顾检索劫持、生成操纵与近良性困惑度。

    SilentRetrieval 是针对 RAG 的两阶段语料投毒,在每查询一篇、合成目标答案的统一协议下,同时处理检索劫持、生成操纵和流畅度。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  14. AttacksarXiv 2603.17239

    LAAF: A Systematic Red-Teaming Method and Automated Attack Framework for LPCI Vulnerabilities in Agentic LLM Systems

    Proposes LAAF, which automatically attacks LPCI vulnerabilities in agent systems in stages

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gemini-2.0-flash-001, claude-3-haiku-20240307, meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct and others5
    AbstractLAAF does LPCI red teaming with taxonomy plus stage seeding.

    The authors state that LAAF is an automated red-teaming framework built specifically for LPCI in agentic LLMs. The issue to address is that encoded, delayed, and conditionally triggered payloads can persist in memory or RAG and re-enter across sessions, whereas Garak and PyRIT do not use the previous round's breakthrough results to seed the next stage across the six stages.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  15. AttacksarXiv 2603.16960

    Adversarial attacks against modern vision-language models

    Conduct adversarial attacks on product images for open-source visual shopping agents and induce wrong purchases

    Published
    Setting
    web agent
    Evaluated models
    LLaVA-v1.5-7B, Qwen2.5-VL-7B
    AbstractThe authors state that LLaVA is easily induced by three attacks to buy the wrong item, while Qwen's correct purchase rate remains close to its clean condition.

    The authors compare the robustness of two open-source VLM shopping agents against image adversarial perturbations in a self-built e-commerce environment.

    Paper analysisRead analysis