Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 13 · Tuesday
Another 215 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
用分类后缀提升激活探针对分布外恶意输入的检测
Published Oct 2
Evaluated models Llama-3.1-8B , Qwen3.5-9B , Gemma-4-12B Abstract 作者称排序增益来自分类格式,低 FPR 精度来自点名准则。用户轮后的分类后缀,被作者用作激活探针的分布外检测干预:排序看格式,低 FPR 精度看是否点名恶意/良性。
提出 LODO 评测恶意提示探针的跨数据集泛化
Published Feb 15
Evaluated models Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct , Gemma-3-27B , Qwen-3.5-4B and others5 Abstract 作者称 LODO 露出 CV 高估,数据集身份与安全方向部分重叠,标准域泛化干预关不上。LODO 用来检查恶意提示词分类器换成没见过的数据集后,还剩多少检测能力。 。
You have reached the end