Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 10 papers
Filter4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 232papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 232papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. DefensesarXiv 2610.07657

    DEFER1 多智能体防御研究报告受控测试中的攻击成功率下降

    实现 DEFER,以确定性检查优先拦截多智能体流水线的内容攻击

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, gpt-oss-120b, Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct and others5
    AbstractDEFER 把确定性检查放在 judge 之前。

    DEFER 用来测量多智能体授权流水线里,确定性规则在何处结束、LLM judge 从何处开始。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. DefensesarXiv 2610.02861

    论文提出在 Kubernetes 上保护 AI Agent 的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    提出 Kubernetes 运维智能体的七层纵深防御框架与参考架构

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Abstract把运维智能体当不可信租户,用七层控制在完全攻破假设下约束行动。

    把 Kubernetes 上的运维智能体当作不可信租户,在假定提示注入已完全控制其工具选择的前提下,用基础设施重建数据面与控制面的边界。要解决的是:智能体读日志、注解、工单或 MCP 工具描述时,这些内容可以变成它带着自身凭据执行的命令。模型对齐和分类器只降低概率。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. DefensesarXiv 2610.01349

    PACE:面向工具调用 LLM Agent 的来源感知能力强制执行

    提出 PACE,在工具调用前做路径隔离与效果授权

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5.6-luna, DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Qwen-3.8-27B
    AbstractPACE 在工具边界做路径割与效果核验。

    PACE 是面向工具调用型 LLM 智能体的运行时调解:当准入证据无法区分会改变行为的规格时,不在出口站点上撤销调解,而在最后一次工具调用前同时检查表示出的影响路径和请求权限。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. DefensesarXiv 2609.17648

    多智能体 LLM 流水线中的信任传播与结构隔离

    用任务绑定令牌和策略预言机拦住多智能体流水线的未授权执行

    Published
    Evaluated models
    gemma4:31b-cloud
    Abstract结构性授权拦住了记忆投毒的未授权执行,持密钥时承重的是策略预言机。

    作者在一条会改写沙箱邮件库的四智能体流水线上,检查低权限失陷会不会变成未授权的真实动作。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. DefensesarXiv 2609.29647

    AgentKernel:面向 Agent 的可信原生操作系统内核

    提出 AgentKernel,用四支柱强制中介 Agent 的输入、工具与记忆

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractAgentKernel 是四支柱智能体 OS 设计,安全论证未附带实测数字。

    AgentKernel 是把安全做成组织原则的智能体 OS 架构,不是带跑分的攻防评测。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. DefensesarXiv 2608.21101

    ClawSentry:面向自主 LLM Agent 的渐进式多层安全监控网关

    提出 ClawSentry 多层监控网关,在技能准入和运行时拦截恶意技能与隐藏指令

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Codex/GPT-5.4, Codex/GPT-5.5, Claude Code/GLM-5.1 and others6
    AbstractClawSentry 用包准入、三级运行时门控和反绕过,压低 skill 攻击并保住干净任务。

    ClawSentry 是挂在智能体运行时之外的安全监督网关,用来同时盖住 skill 执行的多个生命周期边界,并把已被拒绝的效果记到会话里。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. DefensesarXiv 2606.24322

    Protecting LLM agent long-term memory from poisoning: tamper-evident, source-bound permissions and machine-checkable guarantees

    提出 TMA-NM,以写时来源绑定抵御 Agent 长期记忆投毒

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    gpt-5-chat, gpt-4o-mini, claude-opus-4.1 and others8
    AbstractTMA-NM 用来源绑定的行动权限挡住记忆洗白。

    TMA-NM 把 LLM 智能体长期记忆的行动权限绑到写时来源,用来挡住跨会话记忆投毒。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. DefensesarXiv 2603.12644

    Revealing security threats and defense architectures for autonomous agents: an OpenClaw case study

    Reviews threats to autonomous agents and proposes a full-lifecycle defense blueprint, FASA

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractUsing OpenClaw as an example, it divides risks into three layers and uses FASA to describe defense from input to system execution.

    This is a threat review and defense architecture report using OpenClaw as a case study, not a scored attack or defense evaluation.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. DefensesarXiv 2603.11619

    Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Threats in Autonomous LLM Agents

    Proposes a defense-in-depth aligned with the five stages to mitigate cross-stage threats to autonomous agents

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    AbstractThis is a lifecycle threat analysis and layered mitigation design for OpenClaw, with the cases serving as qualitative evidence.

    This is a lifecycle threat analysis of OpenClaw, accompanied by a set of layered mitigation designs. The problem addressed is: when autonomous agents connect instant messaging, persistent memory, third-party plugins, and high-privilege execution, attacks are no longer limited to single-turn jailbreaks but can compound across multiple stages from initialization to execution. The authors argue that defenses hardening only individual interfaces cannot stop such cross-temporal attacks.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end