Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 2 papers
Filter5

Attack type

Prompt injection3Poisoning and backdoors2

Model risks

Misalignment and value divergence1Hallucination and fabrication1

System type

coding agent2science agent0
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack type：Poisoning and backdoorsModel risks：Misalignment and value divergenceModel risks：Hallucination and fabricationSystem type：coding agentSystem type：science agentClear all

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2609.32616

    Cave-Bench：虚假指控下 LLM 智能体最高 60.06% 的运行会破坏正确工作

    提出 CAVE-BENCH，评测智能体在虚假指责下破坏已完成的正确工作

    arXiv
    2609.32616
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Claude-Sonnet-5, Claude-Opus-5, GPT-5.6-Sol and others14

    Abstract论文提出了评估智能体在虚假指责下破坏已有正确成果的 CAVE-BENCH，发现强模型易推翻已知证据，提出了门控缓解方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2607.12340

    Research: LLM agent skill-name hallucination rates reach up to 62%, which can be exploited via squatting for supply-chain attacks

    提出技能名称抢注攻击，利用 Agent 虚构技能名实施供应链劫持

    arXiv
    2607.12340
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GLM-4.5-Air, GPT-5.4-mini, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12
    Abstract研究证实智能体虚构技能名具有高发生率与可预测性，现有防御难以兼顾安全与效用，亟需注册表结构性防护。

    本研究系统揭示了大模型智能体技能推荐场景下的虚构技能名称安全风险，将其形式化为一种新型供应链抢注攻击。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end