Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 5 papers
Filter5

Attack type

Jailbreaks17Prompt injection7Poisoning and backdoors5Model tampering7Detection evasion9

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization2Automated search10Encoding and obfuscation4Defense-targeted8Dormant triggers25Selection manipulation3

System type

Models and APIs2LLM applications5AI Agent11coding agent3

Attack surface / entry point

Tool and skill descriptions3Distribution channels3

Layer

Application layer3

System component

MCP and skills3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 240papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack type：Poisoning and backdoorsAttack technique：Gradient and representation optimizationAttack technique：Selection manipulationSystem type：Models and APIsSystem type：coding agentClear all

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  2. AttacksarXiv 2610.01367

    研究：高质量数据筛选挡不住投毒

    提出 Bi-QSTO，优化能穿过质量筛选并在微调中削弱安全对齐的投毒样本

    arXiv
    2610.01367
    Published
    Layer
    Training and data layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Llama2-7B-Chat, Llama3-8B-Instruct, Qwen2-7B-Instruct and others5
    Abstract质量筛选挡不住部分高分样本的安全削弱。

    Bi-QSTO 研究一个实际训练缺口：基于质量的数据选择会先于微调决定样本去留，而以往微调投毒多假设毒样本直接进入训练集。已对齐 LLM 的拒答会被少量有害或看似无害的微调样本削弱。作者用三个问题串起实验：选择能否排除毒样本。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2608.25776

    EvoMal attack uses self-poisoning of self-evolving coding agents to achieve worm-like propagation

    提出 EVOMAL，诱导自演化编码 Agent 在创建技能时自我投毒并蠕虫传播

    arXiv
    2608.25776
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Devstral-Small-2, Gemma-4-31B-IT, Qwen3-Coder-Next and others7

    Abstract论文指出了自演化智能体模仿检索代码的自我毒化漏洞，提出 EVOMAL 攻击与防御，阐明了供应链新风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2607.12340

    Research: LLM agent skill-name hallucination rates reach up to 62%, which can be exploited via squatting for supply-chain attacks

    提出技能名称抢注攻击，利用 Agent 虚构技能名实施供应链劫持

    arXiv
    2607.12340
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GLM-4.5-Air, GPT-5.4-mini, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and others12
    Abstract研究证实智能体虚构技能名具有高发生率与可预测性，现有防御难以兼顾安全与效用，亟需注册表结构性防护。

    本研究系统揭示了大模型智能体技能推荐场景下的虚构技能名称安全风险，将其形式化为一种新型供应链抢注攻击。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end