Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 262 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
提出 MADBench,评测多智能体辩论是吸收还是放大对抗影响
Published Sep 30
Evaluated models gpt-4o , GPT-5 , GPT-6 Astra Abstract MADBench 显示辩论能吸收部分准确率攻击,同时放大未授权读写。MADBench 是一个评测多智能体辩论安全性的基准,用来看攻击是被辩论吸收还是被放大。
提出 VirusCascade,联合操纵商品描述与交互轨迹以劫持推荐智能体协同反思
Published Sep 29
Evaluated models AgentCF , AgentSEQ , AgentRAG and others4 Abstract 作者把反思写回视为推广攻击入口,并用联合操纵和诊断探针研究其持续与传播。VirusCascade 是针对推荐智能体协作反思的 black-box targeted promotion 攻击研究。 攻击者只改商品描述和少量账号的普通交互,试图让目标商品获得更多良性用户曝光。
You have reached the end