Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 1 paper
Filter4

Attack type

Prompt injection9Poisoning and backdoors14Malicious use1

Attack surface / entry point

User input13Code repositories and dependencies1Memory writes0Training data0
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 240papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack type：Malicious useAttack surface / entry point：Code repositories and dependenciesAttack surface / entry point：Memory writesAttack surface / entry point：Training dataClear all

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2604.02947

    AgentHazard：评估计算机使用智能体有害行为的基准

    提出 AgentHazard 基准，评测计算机使用智能体的执行层有害行为

    arXiv
    2604.02947
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    Browser and computer use, coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct, Qwen3-32B and others12
    AbstractAgentHazard 评估了计算机使用智能体的执行安全，作者认为模型层对齐无法可靠保障智能体层面的安全性。

    AgentHazard 是针对计算机使用智能体执行层安全构建的评估基准，重点探究多步工具调用下局部合理动作累积引发的危害。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end