Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 3 papers
Filter2

Attack type

Jailbreaks3

System type

Models and APIs3

Attack surface / entry point

User input3

Layer

Model layer3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack type：JailbreaksLayer：Model layerClear all

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Risky behaviorarXiv 2609.08186

    论文揭示大推理模型的对齐崩溃并提出 Reasoning Trap 越狱范式

    揭示推理加深引发的对齐坍塌，用 Reasoning Trap 放大越狱

    arXiv
    2609.08186
    Published
    Layer
    Model layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-14B, Llama2-7B and others8
    Abstract更深推理提升题目准确率，同时提高扰动下的相对损失。

    作者研究扩展推理是否以对齐稳健性为代价，提出 ALR、RT 与 RRA。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. Risky behaviorarXiv 2602.19450

    Red-teaming Claude Opus and ChatGPT security advisors for trusted execution environments

    Evaluating mechanism hallucination and prompt-induced failures in TEE advisors using TEE-REDBENCH

    arXiv
    2602.19450
    Published
    Layer
    Model layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT-5.2, Claude Opus-4.6
    AbstractThe authors used TEE-REDBENCH to test two advisors, stating that failures are transferable and that pipeline controls can reduce their occurrence rate.

    TEE-REDBENCH red-teaming evaluation is used on ChatGPT-5.2 and Claude Opus-4.6 as security advisors for Intel SGX and Arm TrustZone, examining architecture reasoning, remote attestation semantics, mitigation suggestions, and refusals under policy constraints, and testing whether prompt-induced failures transfer across assistants. The authors treat the assistants as stochastic policies.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end