Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 3 papers
Filter1

Attack type

Jailbreaks3Prompt injection4

System type

Models and APIs3

Attack surface / entry point

User input3

Layer

Model layer3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 305papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack type：JailbreaksClear all

Another 305papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. Risky behaviorarXiv 2609.08186

    论文揭示大推理模型的对齐崩溃并提出 Reasoning Trap 越狱范式

    揭示推理加深引发的对齐坍塌，用 Reasoning Trap 放大越狱

    arXiv
    2609.08186
    Published
    Layer
    Model layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-14B, Llama2-7B and others8
    Abstract更深推理提升题目准确率，同时提高扰动下的相对损失。

    作者研究扩展推理是否以对齐稳健性为代价，提出 ALR、RT 与 RRA。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. Risky behaviorarXiv 2602.19450

    对面向可信执行环境的 Claude Opus 与 ChatGPT 安全顾问进行红队测试

    用 TEE-REDBENCH 评测 TEE 顾问的机制幻觉与提示诱导失败

    arXiv
    2602.19450
    Published
    Layer
    Model layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT-5.2, Claude Opus-4.6
    Abstract作者用 TEE-REDBENCH 测两款顾问，称失败可迁移且流水线控制可降低发生率。

    TEE-REDBENCH 红队评测被当作 Intel SGX 与 Arm TrustZone 安全顾问的 ChatGPT-5.2 和 Claude Opus-4.6，看架构推理、远程证明语义、缓解建议和策略约束下的拒答，并测提示诱导失败能否跨助手迁移。作者把助手看成随机策略。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end