Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 6 papers
Filter2
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 215papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 215papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. PatchBench 提出激活补丁局部评测协议,揭示越狱修复的附带损伤

    提出 PatchBench-Local 协议,评测激活补丁修复越狱的局部附带损伤

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct, gemma-3-4b-it and others8

    Abstract论文提出 PatchBench 与局部评估协议,揭示了激活补丁在全局能力无损下仍存局部良性退化。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. REINS:用 SAE 特征同时抑制有害续写并增强拒答的引导方法

    提出 REINS,在 SAE 空间抑制有害延续并增强拒答

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3.5-4B-Base, Qwen3.5-2B-Base, Gemma-3-1B-IT
    AbstractREINS 分角色抑制有害延续并增强拒答。

    REINS 是一种推理时 SAE 安全转向方法,并配有用于上下文伪装的基准 GUISE。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. aiXamine:跨维度评测 LLM 安全、安全(security)与隐私权衡

    提出 aiXamine 黑盒基准,统一评测 LLM 安全、稳健与隐私权衡

    Published
    Evaluated models
    openai/gpt-5-mini, openai/gpt-4o, anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 and others15
    AbstractaiXamine 用九服务黑盒协议比较百余个模型,作者称单轴信任度进展可能削弱其他轴。

    aiXamine 是一套黑盒评测协议,用来在同一条件下比较 LLM 的 safety、security 与 privacy,而不是再产出一个能力分。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. Red-teaming Claude Opus and ChatGPT security advisors for trusted execution environments

    Evaluating mechanism hallucination and prompt-induced failures in TEE advisors using TEE-REDBENCH

    Published
    Evaluated models
    ChatGPT-5.2, Claude Opus-4.6
    AbstractThe authors used TEE-REDBENCH to test two advisors, stating that failures are transferable and that pipeline controls can reduce their occurrence rate.

    TEE-REDBENCH red-teaming evaluation is used on ChatGPT-5.2 and Claude Opus-4.6 as security advisors for Intel SGX and Arm TrustZone, examining architecture reasoning, remote attestation semantics, mitigation suggestions, and refusals under policy constraints, and testing whether prompt-induced failures transfer across assistants. The authors treat the assistants as stochastic policies.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. When benchmarks lie: evaluating malicious prompt classifiers under real-world distribution shift

    提出 LODO 评测恶意提示探针的跨数据集泛化

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Gemma-3-27B, Qwen-3.5-4B and others5
    Abstract作者称 LODO 露出 CV 高估,数据集身份与安全方向部分重叠,标准域泛化干预关不上。

    LODO 用来检查恶意提示词分类器换成没见过的数据集后,还剩多少检测能力。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end