Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 7 papers
Filter5

Attack type

Jailbreaks7

Attack technique

Gradient and representation optimization17Automated search45Multi-turn escalation23Encoding and obfuscation39Role-play and persuasion21Conversation structure manipulation9Reasoning-chain manipulation7Cross-modal payloads32Defense-targeted6

Impact

Harmful content7

System type

Models and APIs7coding agent0Embodied systems and robotics0

Attacker access

Black-box5

Attack surface / entry point

User input7

Layer

Prompt layer6

System component

Reasoning chains6
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 240papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack type：JailbreaksAttack technique：Reasoning-chain manipulationSystem type：Models and APIsSystem type：coding agentSystem type：Embodied systems and roboticsClear all

Another 240papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  2. AttacksarXiv 2609.09553

    研究：任意密文攻击前沿大模型无需微调即可越狱

    提出任意字母置换密码越狱，无需微调即可诱导有害输出

    arXiv
    2609.09553
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3 Flash (preview) and others7

    Abstract前沿大模型无需微调即可通过提示词学会字母置换密码，进而绕过分类器与对齐，作者呼吁关注能力提升带来的安全风险。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. Risky behaviorarXiv 2609.08186

    论文揭示大推理模型的对齐崩溃并提出 Reasoning Trap 越狱范式

    揭示推理加深引发的对齐坍塌，用 Reasoning Trap 放大越狱

    arXiv
    2609.08186
    Published
    Layer
    Model layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3-8B, Qwen3-14B, Llama2-7B and others8
    Abstract更深推理提升题目准确率，同时提高扰动下的相对损失。

    作者研究扩展推理是否以对齐稳健性为代价，提出 ALR、RT 与 RRA。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2603.10091

    Multi-Stream Perturbation Attack: Breaking the Safety Alignment of Reasoning LLMs through Concurrent Task Interference

    提出多流扰动攻击，交织有害与良性任务绕过思考型 LLM 安全对齐

    arXiv
    2603.10091
    Published
    Layer
    Prompt layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    Qwen3 1.7B, Qwen3 4B, Qwen3 8B and others11
    Abstract多流扰动用任务交织测试 thinking 模式，作者称它同时冲击内容安全与推理稳定性。

    多流扰动攻击把有害任务与良性任务织进同一提示词，测试 thinking 模式的内容安全与推理稳定性。作者认为，交织多任务会拉长思考，使安全检测面对被打散的有害意图，并可能把推理用于合理化，或陷入崩溃与重复。方法不访问梯度。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end