Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 4 papers
Filter5

Attack type

Jailbreaks2Prompt injection13Poisoning and backdoors5Malicious use2

System type

AI Agent4coding agent4science agent0

Attack surface / entry point

User input14Code repositories and dependencies4

Layer

Application layer4
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 227papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack type：JailbreaksAttack type：Malicious useSystem type：coding agentSystem type：science agentAttack surface / entry point：Code repositories and dependenciesClear all

Another 227papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.01768

    LLMLeak：借 LLM 合法网页抓取实施隐蔽数据外泄

    提出 LLMLeak，借合法网页抓取把 URL 中的秘密隐蔽外传

    arXiv
    2610.01768
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Meta-Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, Meta-Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct, Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and others18
    Abstract作者称第三方外传可发生于正常网页获取，防护需考虑工具请求而不只考虑提示注入。

    LLMLeak 是利用网页获取请求携带预先编码秘密的隐蔽通道攻击。它关注恶意软件已能读取数据、却因网络限制或监控无法直接外传的情形。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2607.11698

    AHA 用自动研究循环发现生产 Agent 漏洞概念

    提出 AHA 自动科研循环，发现生产 Agent 的可复用漏洞概念

    arXiv
    2607.11698
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Minimax-M2.7, Kimi-K2.6, Deepseek-V4-Pro and others5
    Abstract论文提出基于可证伪科研循环的 AHA 框架，从生产级智能体中挖掘并沉淀漏洞概念图，提升攻击复用率并指导防御加固。

    AHA 是一项针对生产级 LLM 智能体自动化红队测试的研究，旨在解决传统方法仅保留具体攻击载荷而缺乏成因解释、导致跨版本复用困难且无法指导修复的问题。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2604.02947

    AgentHazard：评估计算机使用智能体有害行为的基准

    提出 AgentHazard 基准，评测计算机使用智能体的执行层有害行为

    arXiv
    2604.02947
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    Browser and computer use, coding agent
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct, Qwen3-32B and others12
    AbstractAgentHazard 评估了计算机使用智能体的执行安全，作者认为模型层对齐无法可靠保障智能体层面的安全性。

    AgentHazard 是针对计算机使用智能体执行层安全构建的评估基准，重点探究多步工具调用下局部合理动作累积引发的危害。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. Evaluation and benchmarksarXiv 2510.01359

    JAWS-Bench：研究者用三种工作区场景系统越狱代码 Agent

    提出 JAWS-Bench，评测代码 Agent 在三级工作区中的越狱与恶意代码可执行性

    arXiv
    2510.01359
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    coding agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4.1, GPT-o1, DeepSeek-R1 and others8

    Abstract论文提出了评估代码智能体端到端恶意代码越狱的 JAWS-Bench，发现多文件与智能体推理会明显放大可部署危害。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end