Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 3 papers
Filter3

Attack type

Jailbreaks35Prompt injection13Poisoning and backdoors11Model tampering3Extraction and theft3Detection evasion17

Attack technique

Automated search6Multi-turn escalation2Role-play and persuasion3Side channels4Defense-targeted1
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 227papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack type：Extraction and theftAttack technique：Multi-turn escalationAttack technique：Defense-targetedClear all

Another 227papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2609.10117

    研究揭示基于混淆的端侧 LLM 保护方案的安全边界

    提出 Collapse，从端侧混淆暴露视图抽取高效用替代模型

    arXiv
    2609.10117
    Published
    Layer
    Model layer
    Setting
    Models and APIs
    Evaluated models
    BERT-Base, ViT-Base, Qwen2.5-0.5B and others4
    AbstractOprior 是四原语复合的安全边界，Collapse 利用列方向泄漏抽取替代模型，Oext 只被同一攻击评测。

    这篇工作用代数原语统一若干 TEE 卸载混淆，给出该族的典范边界，再说明该边界挡不住一种分阶段模型抽取。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2602.07379

    Aegis: Governance, Integrity, and Security for AI Voice Agents

    提出 Aegis 红队框架，多轮攻击高风险语音 Agent

    arXiv
    2602.07379
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini-1.5 Pro and others7
    AbstractAegis red-teams three types of voice agents: query-based access eliminates authentication and leakage successes, but behavioral attacks remain.

    Aegis uses multi-turn red-teaming evaluation on ALLM voice agents already integrated into business systems. The authors call this the first systematic red-teaming framework in this setting.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end