Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 3 papers
Filter4

Attack type

Jailbreaks20Prompt injection7Extraction and theft3Detection evasion3

Attack technique

Automated search4Role-play and persuasion3

Attack surface / entry point

User input3

Layer

Prompt layer1Application layer2
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
Attack type：Extraction and theftAttack technique：Role-play and persuasionLayer：Prompt layerLayer：Application layerClear all

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.04985

    研究揭示 Jev 作为应用决策层的安全与隐私风险

    评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险

    arXiv
    2610.04985
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    LLM applications
    Attacker
    Black-box, Gray-box
    Evaluated models
    Jev, NanoJev
    AbstractJev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵，也会泄露信息，并同时支持检测与滥用。

    Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型，把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev，考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2602.07379

    Aegis: Governance, Integrity, and Security for AI Voice Agents

    提出 Aegis 红队框架，多轮攻击高风险语音 Agent

    arXiv
    2602.07379
    Published
    Layer
    Application layer
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini-1.5 Pro and others7
    AbstractAegis red-teams three types of voice agents: query-based access eliminates authentication and leakage successes, but behavioral attacks remain.

    Aegis uses multi-turn red-teaming evaluation on ALLM voice agents already integrated into business systems. The authors call this the first systematic red-teaming framework in this setting.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end