Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 13 · Tuesday
Another 213 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险
Published Oct 4
Evaluated models Jev , NanoJev Abstract Jev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵,也会泄露信息,并同时支持检测与滥用。Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型,把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev,考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。
提出主题锚点投毒,放大众包微调后的专有指令提取
Published Sep 28
Evaluated models Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct , Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct , Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and others4 Abstract 论文提出基于主题锚点的数据中毒攻击,证明低比例的中毒样本可在黑盒条件下隐蔽放大微调指令泄漏。
You have reached the end