Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 13 · Tuesday
Another 203 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
检验权重谱度量能否代理成员推断泄漏
Published Sep 11
Evaluated models MLP-1×4096 , MLP-2×1024 , MLP-2×2048 and others11 Abstract 作者认为谱度量与泛化差距互补，有望用于无数据的模型级筛查。作者在 MLP 上检查 WeightWatcher 谱统计是否与 online LiRA 同向，以便不看数据、不训练 shadow 模型就做模型级成员风险筛查。放出前的审计要知道训练成员会不会被认出来。LiRA 依赖大量 shadow 模型，候选一多就难以逐个跑。
You have reached the end