Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 13 · Tuesday

All papers

Found 11 papers

Another 215papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2610.04985

    研究揭示 Jev 作为应用决策层的安全与隐私风险

    评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Jev, NanoJev
    AbstractJev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵,也会泄露信息,并同时支持检测与滥用。

    Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型,把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev,考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2609.27542

    Researchers use control token injection to delete gpt-oss-20b's reasoning chain and bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出控制标记注入,清空工具 Agent 的思维链以绕过推理监控

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    openai/gpt-oss-20b, google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and others4

    Abstract论文阐明控制标记注入可抑制 CoT 使监控失效并促成拒绝绕过,且工具执行受解析器宽容度影响。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. 研究用 XAI 归因分析 Prompt Guard 2,同义词替换可翻转其提示注入判定

    用词级归因指导同义词替换,翻转提示注入检测并验证越狱

    Published
    Evaluated models
    Prompt Guard 2 (86M), Llama 3.1 8B

    Abstract作者称检测靠分散的词法线索。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. SinoGlyphBench:中文字形混淆下语言模型审核的诊断基准

    提出 SinoGlyphBench,用配对字形混淆诊断中文审核稳定性

    Published
    Evaluated models
    GPT-5.4 mini, GPT-5.5, DeepSeek V4 Flash and others12
    AbstractSinoGlyphBench 显示中文字形混淆会同时增加有害漏报和误报,全文扰动最重。

    SinoGlyphBench是一个配对诊断基准,用来看内容审核在可还原的中文字形混淆下是否还保持原决定。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2608.09867

    Researchers steal proprietary LLM inference chains via cross-model compatibility of encrypted inference blocks

    利用加密思维块的跨模型重放,诱导弱模型逐字转写专有推理链

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Haiku 4.5 and others13

    Abstract论文揭示了客户端加密思维块跨模型互换漏洞,提出了低成本提取方法并给出防御方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  6. AttacksarXiv 2606.09700

    The researchers propose the HPAA attack: bypassing 13 content moderation systems with typographic visual cues

    提出 HPAA 攻击,用排版视觉线索绕过内容审核系统

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Llama-Guard-3-8B, Perspective API, ShieldGemma-2B and others13
    Abstract揭示了排版视觉线索与分词差异带来的审核盲区,HPAA 以极低查询实现近乎完全规避。

    这篇论文研究了人类视觉感知与大模型分词处理机制之间的差异所导致的内容审核漏洞。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  7. AttacksarXiv 2604.01039

    Evaluating and hardening LLM system instructions against encoding attack extraction

    Extract system instructions with encoding and structured requests, and harden them by rewriting with CoT

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    GPT-4.1-mini, GPT-3.5-turbo, Gemini-2.5-flash and others7
    AbstractEncoded requests can elicit system instructions after a direct refusal.

    This work evaluates and hardens the confidentiality of LLM system instructions under encoded extraction. The authors are concerned with: when direct extraction has been rejected, whether the model still surrenders protected content when the same request is rewritten as a formatting or encoding task.

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  8. AttacksarXiv 2602.05484

    Masked Mirror: Covert Prompt Injection Attacks Against LLM-Based Phishing Detection

    提出隐蔽提示注入攻击 LLM 钓鱼检测器,并给出防御 InjectDefuser

    Published
    Evaluated models
    OpenAI GPT-5, xAI Grok 4 Fast (Non-Reasoning), Meta Llama 4 Maverick and others4
    Paper analysisRead analysis
  9. AttacksarXiv 2509.09112

    研究:字符级扰动可破坏 LLM 水印,并提出基于遗传算法的去除攻击

    提出字符级扰动与遗传算法去除 LLM 水印

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    OPT-1.3B, LLaMA-3-8B
    Abstract字符级扰动靠更大攻击范围移除水印。

    这篇工作评估推理时 LLM 水印在黑盒、有限查询下的移除难度,并比较字符级、token 级和句子级编辑。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end