Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Oct 12 · Monday

All papers

Found 5 papers
Filter3
Select any value within a category; different categories must all match. Counts include the other filters you have selected.Another 233papers have no tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

Another 233papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.

  1. AttacksarXiv 2609.35699

    论文:蒸馏防御在蒸馏后强化学习下易被攻破

    提出用 API 推理摘要重建轨迹再蒸馏加强化学习,攻破蒸馏防御

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-0.5B, Qwen2.5-1.5B, Qwen2.5-3B and others12
    Abstract更现实的蒸馏攻击是蒸馏后再 RL。

    这篇工作修订蒸馏攻击的威胁模型:攻击者经合法 API 收集闭源推理数据,先蒸馏自有模型,再做强化学习。作者认为只在蒸馏后评估防御,会漏掉后续 RL,从而高估防御。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  2. AttacksarXiv 2609.27542

    Researchers use control token injection to delete gpt-oss-20b's reasoning chain and bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出控制标记注入,清空工具 Agent 的思维链以绕过推理监控

    Published
    Setting
    AI Agent
    Evaluated models
    openai/gpt-oss-20b, google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and others4

    Abstract论文阐明控制标记注入可抑制 CoT 使监控失效并促成拒绝绕过,且工具执行受解析器宽容度影响。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  3. AttacksarXiv 2609.15989

    Researchers propose plan injection attack that can bypass chain-of-thought monitoring

    提出 plan injection 攻击,植入良性伪装计划以绕过思维链监视器

    Published
    Attacker
    Gray-box
    Evaluated models
    Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct, Qwen3-8B, DeepSeek-R1-0528 and others6

    Abstract论文指出模型会将外部上下文中的伪装计划改写为自身推理,使思维链监视器失效甚至反向合理化恶意行为。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  4. AttacksarXiv 2608.09867

    Researchers steal proprietary LLM inference chains via cross-model compatibility of encrypted inference blocks

    利用加密思维块的跨模型重放,诱导弱模型逐字转写专有推理链

    Published
    Attacker
    Black-box
    Evaluated models
    Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Haiku 4.5 and others13

    Abstract论文揭示了客户端加密思维块跨模型互换漏洞,提出了低成本提取方法并给出防御方案。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
  5. AttacksarXiv 2605.30040

    研究揭示 LLM 按 token 计费可被服务商系统性虚报

    构造可通过计费审计的 token 虚报,使服务商系统性超收

    Published
    Evaluated models
    PALACE domain-adapted auditor
    Abstract不诚实提供方可在三种 token 审计上虚报并通过检查,作者认为需改用提供方不控制的证据。

    不透明 LLM 的按 token 计费里,现有审计核验的是提供方可控的证据,不诚实提供方可以虚报并通过检查。。

    Paper analysisRead analysis
You have reached the end