Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 254 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
检验合成数据来源识别是否等于再训练适配筛选
Published Sep 30
Evaluated models Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct , DistilRoBERTa , word TF-IDF logistic regression and others5 Abstract 来源识别在原文上准确,改写后精确归因下降。作者在金融风险文本上把来源识别和训练样本是否有用拆成两次测量,并写明这不是电信部署实验。
比较高效与高成本训练的对抗和隐私脆弱性并分析损失几何
Published Sep 28
Evaluated models ResNet-18 , Swin Transformer , Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct and others7 Abstract 效用匹配下,三种高效训练都伴随更高的隐私与对抗脆弱性及更尖的损失几何。作者在视觉分类和数学推理语言模型上,检查用更少数据或更简对齐换取训练效率时,安全性质是否一起变化。比较在任务效用接近的前提下进行。视觉侧用 KNN-Shapley 的高重要性小子集对照低重要性大子集,并用预训练微调对照从头训练。
You have reached the end