Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 233 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
提出 OBELISK 三级流水线,权衡恶意软件检测的准确率、开销与鲁棒性
Published Sep 8
Evaluated models GBDT-ALL , GBDT-YARA , NEBULA-ALL and others4 Abstract 三级过滤以不大的检测损失换速度,同一机制扩大攻击面,部署应按约束选配置。OBELISK 把 Windows PE 恶意软件检测做成 YARA、EMBER-GBDT 与 Nebula 的顺序流水线,用来同时看检出、计算开销和对抗鲁棒性。
You have reached the end