Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 12 · Monday
Another 261 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险
Published Oct 4
Evaluated models Jev , NanoJev Abstract Jev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵，也会泄露信息，并同时支持检测与滥用。Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型，把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev，考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。
提出 plan injection 攻击，植入良性伪装计划以绕过思维链监视器
Published Sep 15
Evaluated models Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct , Qwen3-8B , DeepSeek-R1-0528 and others6 Abstract 论文指出模型会将外部上下文中的伪装计划改写为自身推理，使思维链监视器失效甚至反向合理化恶意行为。
You have reached the end