Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Oct 13 · Tuesday
Another 215 papers do not have category tags yet and are not included in filtered results.
“
About this collection Collection in progress We are building a large AI safety paper collection to help researchers find work related to their interests. Papers are collected automatically andfiltered only for relevance to AI safety , without judging quality, novelty or reading value. The default “Annotated first” shows papers with tags or published paper analyses first. Each group is ordered by original publication date, newest first, with undated papers last. “Newest first” uses publication dates only. This order is not a quality ranking.
One-line summaries, tags and paper analyses are prepared by AI from the papers. Language models may have systematic biases and produce hallucinations.We plan to carry out human annotation and review to reduce errors in this content.
评估应用决策层的输入注入与隐私推断风险
Published Oct 4
Evaluated models Jev , NanoJev Abstract Jev 的类型化决策可被输入与训练操纵，也会泄露信息，并同时支持检测与滥用。Jev 是 TypeSafe 的 System One 模型，把应用 state 和固定问题变成 Choice、Noul 或 Score 的类型化决策与概率。作者用官方 API 和可改训练的 NanoJev，考察它作为决策层时的操纵、泄露与双重用途。
提出 ReGap，用自生成伪监督微调恢复模型中的隐私关联
Published Oct 1
Evaluated models GPT-2 Small , GPT-2 Medium , GPT-2 Large and others6 Abstract 提出无真实私有监督的恢复攻击 ReGap，实验显示微调可通过自生成数据唤醒模型潜在隐私关联，突显后适应隐私风险。
提出 CIG-MIA，用上下文信息增益推断 RAG 知识库成员身份
Published Sep 14
Evaluated models Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct , Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 , Llama-2-13b-chat-hf and others6 Abstract CIG-MIA 用注入前后的答案似然差推断 RAG 库成员，灰盒可分性高于所列基线。CIG-MIA 是针对 RAG 外部知识库的成员推断攻击，同时覆盖灰盒和纯文本黑盒。
You have reached the end