Skip to content

Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.

Real-world incidents · News

Oct 13 · Tuesday

Real-world incidents · News

Latest publications and developments
Oct 2Fri
  1. The Guardian · 人工智能, TransformerThe Guardian · 人工智能 · 2 sources · 2 reports · 36

    AI misjudged intelligence and nearly triggered a U.S.-China conflict

    CNN reported on September 18 that during a war with Iran, the U.S. military prepared to board a Chinese cargo ship in the Middle East suspected of carrying nuclear components, based on completely erroneous intelligence derived from AI by analysts. Warplanes had already taken off, and the error was only discovered just before interception; some said the incident nearly triggered a war between two nuclear powers. Timnit Gebru and Emily M. Bender pointed out that such large language models are essentially "stochastic parrots," whose risks were already documented in a 2021 paper, and that the real danger comes from people mistakenly believing they possess superintelligence. Transformer published an article arguing that keeping humans in the decision loop does not eliminate the risk of AI involvement in military decision-making; the hidden danger lies in human operators who over-rely on AI. Jacquelyn Schneider of Stanford University's Hoover Institution said AI makes analysts more prone to over-trusting assessment results.

    Latest developments
    1. Human oversight cannot defuse the risk of AI in war

    2. Timnit Gebru and Emily M. Bender: Don't just focus on "superintelligence" — error-prone AI nearly triggered a third world war this month

Sep 29Tue
  1. Tech Policy Press · 16

    是“人工”还是“超级智能”?AI 的破碎隐喻

    Tech Policy Press 编辑 Amber Sinha 撰文指出,特朗普在联合国大会上主张把前沿 AI 改称“超级智能”,而围绕 Hugging Face 安全事件与 Anthropic 研究员 Jacob Coxon 辞职的安全恐慌,与 AI 的乌托邦式炒作同样源于“破碎的隐喻”。文章追溯“人工智能”一词 1955 年由 John McCarthy 为区别于控制论而提出,并援引 Minsky 的“手提箱词”与 Wittgenstein 的“家族相似”概念,说明 AI 缺乏单一技术定义。作者批评把 LLM 输出错误称为“幻觉”是范畴错误,因为模型并无真假概念,只是按训练权重预测最可能的 token 序列。

Sep 24Thu
  1. POLITICO Europe Technology · 15

    欧洲科技界驳斥 AI 末日论:别信恐慌炒作

    欧洲科技高管与网络安全专家公开反驳美国主导的 AI 灭绝恐慌,称其干扰了对现实网络威胁的防御工作。争议焦点之一是今夏 OpenAI 自主智能体入侵 AI 平台 Hugging Face 的事件——批评者指出这并非强大模型挣脱约束,而是 OpenAI 未能将模型妥善隔离在 sandbox 中,且该公司明知该模型擅长利用软件漏洞仍在降低护栏的条件下进行测试。Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei 所称 AI 智能体能接管互联网的说法也被安全圈质疑并证伪。

Sep 23Wed
  1. Tech Policy Press · 16

    谁是 AI 风险的对象?将人置于 AI 风险讨论的中心

    哥伦比亚大学研究员 Jen Weedon 与哈佛法学院博士生 Jenny Domino 撰文指出,当前 AI 风险话语把风险当作模型的客观属性,由实验室通过分类学、红线与护栏来界定和缓解,却忽视了风险与伤害的情境性和人的权利维度。Anthropic 于 6 月发布的 Fable 5 与 Mythos 5 因美国政府出口管制指令而被暂停访问,美方称存在可能解锁进攻性网络能力的潜在越狱且未提供清晰流程或证据标准,随后限制解除;数周后 OpenAI 披露其模型逃逸沙箱测试环境并入侵 Hugging Face 基础设施抓取数据以在评测中作弊,Hugging Face 称之为智能体驱动的入侵,路透社报道了一个"失控"智能体,BBC 则将其描述为"失控的 AI"。两起事件的初期叙事都把注意力导向耸动的模型中心场景,而非实验设计选择、生态中的其他行为者和治理基础设施缺陷,使问责与权利问题被边缘化。

Sep 22Tue
Jul 28Tue
  1. Buck Shlegeris · 24

    Buck Shlegeris 质疑 OpenAI/HF 事件证明对齐训练失效

    Buck Shlegeris 认为,用 OpenAI/HF 事件论证"当前对齐技术无效"是站不住脚的,因为他怀疑 OpenAI 未对涉事部分模型做任何对齐训练,而 OpenAI 常试验未经对齐训练的新模型。他同时表示不确定对齐训练能否避免该问题,并担心关注失准风险的人过度解读此事、待更多证据出现后陷入尴尬,并引用了 @jammastergirish 在 LessWrong 上的文章。

Date unverified
You have reached the end