StateWise: Diagnosing and repairing persistent operation state before agent actions(original, opens in a new tab)
Proposes StateWise, which diagnoses and repairs stale persistent state before coding agents act.
Translation in progress Some entries still include text in the original language.
Page 8 Newer contentBack to latest
Proposes StateWise, which diagnoses and repairs stale persistent state before coding agents act.
Compare tool failure recovery in quantized agents, testing whether prompts and evaluation criteria reverse the direction of comparison.
arXiv will tighten its submission limit to two papers per person per calendar month starting October 1, 2026, because AI tools have pushed monthly submissions past 40,000 papers. In September 2026 the platform received 40,363 submissions, compared with 20,569 in September 2024 and 9,869 in September 2016; the cs.AI category grew more than sixfold over two years and generated nearly 9,000 support tickets. The new rule applies to all categories and only to submitters; co-authors are not affected. Rejected papers still count toward the limit, while deletion before publication returns the quota. Thomas G. Dietterich, chair of the editorial advisory committee, said a small number of authors submit large volumes of low-quality papers, taking up too much of reviewers' time. arXiv calls this a temporary measure and plans to use newly obtained funding for technical upgrades to handle AI-generated content.
Proposes the semantic watermark SemField, which still identifies the origin of generated text after paraphrase and structural modifications.
Proposes SSCBench, evaluating the evidence validity of fault injection testing for tool-calling agents.
Proposes the RAGStress controlled benchmark to evaluate RAG under knowledge base degradation.
Proposes MH-INDIC, evaluating cultural alignment of maternal and child health LLM interactions in the Indian context.
Compare the predictive power of value representations for alignment generalization after single-value fine-tuning.
Propose RL-ARC, which uses reasoning confidence to calibrate reasoning models in reinforcement learning.
Use a clock harness and budget-shaping GRPO to improve agents' on-time return.
Test whether online RL behavior attribution signals are confounded by gradient magnitude and fluency.
Owain Evans introduced his team's new paper on X, stating that models can transfer more complex traits through subliminal learning, including new capabilities not present in pretraining, improvements to existing capabilities, backdoors, and reward hacking in agent scenarios. Previously, the original paper by Cloud et al. only showed models transferring a preference for owls through number sequences, as well as partial transfer of a malicious personality and MNIST skills. The authors listed three limitations: the traits studied were artificially constructed rather than real-world misalignment; some experiments used training setups slightly different from typical distillation; and traits only transferred partially. The authors considered these limitations important but said the conclusions still matter, because worse hyperparameters usually only reduce transfer rather than eliminating it entirely—if a teacher model has a 90% probability of severe harmful behavior in a specific context, the student model might still have a 0.5% probability.
Why it was selectedThe author, in the first person, lays out the conclusions of the new paper and three important limitations, and explains why partial transfer may still pose real-world risks.
Proposes a retrieval admissibility verification framework to evaluate memory agents' record eligibility and disclosure.
Proposes GROB, using read-only public traces to preserve candidate agent leads and test attribution boundaries.
Reconstruct the agent skill replication network and model source selection to guide security audits.
Why it was selectedThe paper reconstructs the copy network of agent skills using git history and provides a reusable repository audit ranking method, allowing security teams to decide which repositories to review first.
Proposes DFI and DFC distillation to convict teachers that conceal mismatches or safely extract capabilities.
Why it was selectedThe paper splits distillation into two uses, validates with the AuditBench secret-keeping model that students are more likely than teachers to confess hidden behaviors, and provides a comparison of interventions that preserve capability while suppressing trait transfer.
Proposes the SafeArena benchmark to evaluate whether web agents execute deliberately harmful tasks.
Researchers at North Carolina State University propose a web threat model for agent browsers and reproduce confusion attacks.
Researchers at the University of Oxford and other institutions built the TRAP benchmark to evaluate how web agents are hijacked by interface prompt injection.
Why it was selectedTRAP decomposes prompt injection into modules such as persuasion principles, manipulation techniques, and interface forms, quantifying the impact of interface details on the probability of web agents being hijacked.
Propose BrowseSafe, which detects and blocks prompt injection in browser agent tool outputs at the boundary.
Propose WAInjectBench to evaluate prompt injection detection in web agents.
Proposes WebInject, which uses webpage pixel perturbations to induce a web agent to execute specified actions.
Researchers at Meta FAIR and other institutions proposed the web agent prompt injection benchmark WASP and evaluated security end-to-end.
Why it was selectedWASP end-to-end measures prompt injection risk for web agents in self-hosted GitLab and Reddit environments, and provides the gap between hijack rate and attack completion rate.
Researchers from Scale AI and Carnegie Mellon University and other institutions propose BrowserART to evaluate the generalization of refusal training to browser agents.
Why it was selectedThe paper gives concrete gaps in refusal between browser agents and the underlying models, and releases a reusable red-teaming test set, suitable for evaluating agent deployment risks.
Build ST-WebAgentBench, a benchmark for evaluating the safety and policy compliance of Web Agents.
Proposes the ARE framework and image-text attacks to evaluate the adversarial robustness of multimodal web agents.
Propose APEXA, which rejects results without execution support at the tool layer and intercepts motor commands.
Proposes SciTrace, adding cross-stage safety reasoning and tool trajectory verification to scientific discovery agents.
Proposes SciIntegrity-Bench to evaluate whether research agents fabricate results.
提出 LABSHIELD,评测科学实验室智能体的安全推理与规划。
Proposes SafeScientist with four-layer monitoring to prevent research agents from executing high-risk or unethical tasks.
Review the risks of AI scientists and advocate a triadic protection framework.
Proposes the SciGuard external guardrail and the SciMT benchmark to control AI misuse in chemical science.
Propose MAFIA to probe placement and fact disguise for query-based memory poisoning of audited agents.
The researchers propose a prompt learning attack framework, PLA, to bypass the safety mechanisms of text-to-image models under black-box conditions where the model architecture and parameters are inaccessible.
Measuring reward hacking and reasoning-answer decoupling under position-confounded optimization.
They propose a jailbreak method that extracts the embedded safety classifier of aligned LLMs and attacks its proxy.
提出 FalseCite 基准,评测虚构引用如何改变事实幻觉。
Propose StyleBreak stylized audio jailbreak, using speech attributes to bypass audio language model alignment.
Proposes image typography manipulation and multi-turn prompt jailbreak to bypass safety alignment in traffic-scenario vision-language models.